tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2894819130819077007.post4415349060476698433..comments2008-06-11T08:21:24.174-04:00Philip Luckeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10964145361517183701noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2894819130819077007.post-227721851050789442008-06-11T08:21:00.000-04:002008-06-11T08:21:00.000-04:00I agree that a major strength of public access TV is its grassroots origins -- both in terms of "how the public access movement came to be" and "how public access gathers content." To me, it's a bottom-up type of communication: people from the community expressing their ideas, sparking discussions, and displaying the wide diversity that our community has in common. However, I think it's helpful (if not essential) to have some level of infrastructure (communication architecture) to enable and enhance and encourage this flow of information from the grassroots to the treetops. (Think craigslist: a fairly straightforward system of categories that enable personal/public interaction on a staggering local & national scale).Philip Luckeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10964145361517183701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2894819130819077007.post-54783323688939225192008-06-10T21:30:00.000-04:002008-06-10T21:30:00.000-04:00That is a great video explaining corporate TV and a great use of archive.org moving images library.<BR/><BR/>Question: How do you sell anyone on the idea of "deproduction"? My thought is that it starts grassroots..Chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09361813884738134132noreply@blogger.com